Why is Augmented AI considered ethically preferable?

Augmented AI is considered ethically preferable primarily because it ensures that the clinician retains final responsibility for patient care decisions. This approach emphasizes the collaborative nature of AI, where technology augments the capabilities of healthcare professionals rather than replacing them. By maintaining human oversight, augmented AI allows clinicians to apply their judgement and expertise, ensuring that patient safety and ethical considerations are prioritized.

This reliance on human decision-making can also contribute to greater accountability, as it enables healthcare providers to review and assess AI-generated recommendations critically. In contrast, options suggesting cost reduction, elimination of human error, or speeding up treatment processes, while beneficial, don't address the ethical implications of maintaining human oversight in clinical practice. Ensuring that practitioners remain central to the decision-making process enhances the trustworthiness of AI systems and serves to uphold the standards of ethical healthcare delivery.